Clients who own or who are
purchasing real estate often have concerns about the liabilities associated
with investment real estate ownership. And with good cause. There are
occasionally some very large judgments against property owners arising out
of injury or death to tenants or their guests or invitees.
I should clarify that the liabilities discussed in this article are tort
liabilities rather than contract liabilities; liabilities which result from
some form or injury to a person rather than liabilities which result from a
default under a contract such as a mortgage.
Most of the large settlements or jury awards against property owners for
injury to a person are arise out of a legal body of law referred to
generally as “premises liability”. Recoveries based upon premises liability
hold a land owner responsible for injuries which occur on the land owner’s
property.
Judgments or settlements can involve millions of dollars. It is difficult or
impossible to cover premises liability risks with liability insurance. Often
liability policies insuring property owners against premises liability risks
have large gaps in coverage and do not provide enough monetary coverage.
For the reasons outlined above, I am often approached by clients to help
insulate them from the risks associated with owning real estate. t is not
possible, in any article such as this one, to address this subject in depth.
However, I will discuss some of the basic pro-active steps a property owner
may take to protect assets from potential creditors. A word of caution. Any
attempt to protect assets from creditors must be initiated prior to the act
creating liability. After the injury for which liability may arise has
occurred and certainly after a suit is filed., it is usually too late to
initiate action to protect assets from the claim.
There are some basic asset protection steps which anyone can and should take
to protect assets from third party claims. These are, for the most part,
non-invasive and free or very inexpensive. Most of the initial or basic
asset protection techniques involve taking advantage of the laws which
protect certain assets from creditor claims. The most well known of these
laws in Texas is the homestead exemption.
By purchasing a home and paying cash or quickly paying down the debt, you
can protect the cash invested in your home from all creditors other than the
mortgage holder on your home, unpaid property tax on the home, and federal
government claims (such as income tax liability).
Other less well known exemption laws protect funds held in IRAs, 401K plans
as well as pension plans. Cash value of life insurance is also protected.
Any one desiring to protect assets from creditor claims should maximize
contributions to retirement and pension accounts.
If you are married, the second level of asset protection usually involves
partitioning your community property into separate property. All property
acquired during marriage is presumed to be community property. Community
property is owned equally by both marriage partners. Community property,
including the interest of both spouses in community property, may be taken
by a judgment creditor of either spouse. Separate property may be taken only
to satisfy the claims against the spouse owning the separate property. Thus
by partitioning or dividing community property into separate property, one
half of the property of a marriage may be excluded from the claims against
one of the marriage partners.
While partitioning property does not change the percentage ownership of
property (each party will still own one-half of the partitioned property) it
may have estate tax ramifications and could have negative benefits in the
event of divorce.
After maximizing use of exemptions and partitioning community property, the
next level of asset protection usually involves the creation of entities to
contain liability within an entity or protect other assets from creditor
claims by placing those assets within an entity created for that purpose.
The issues involved determining whether this is a feasible approach and in
selecting the type of entity can be very complex. Generally, there are four
entity choices to choose from; corporations, limited liability companies,
general partnerships and limited partnerships.
The general partnership can usually be immediately eliminated since all of
the partners of the partnership are fully liable for any injuries arising
out of real estate owned by the partnership. It provides no protection at
all.
Corporations provide a liability shield but are usually not good choices to
hold title to real estate, primarily because of negative federal income tax
treatment. You should never form any entity to hold title to real estate
without consulting your accountant to fully understand the tax consequences
and you should certainly never form a corporation to hold title to your real
estate without fully understanding the federal income tax consequences
including the potential for double taxation when you attempt to extract cash
from the corporation after the sale of real estate.
Limited liability companies are a good choice to hold title to real estate
from a federal income tax perspective. You can elect to have the limited
liability company taxed as a partnership, thus eliminating the negative
federal income tax problems, while still retaining a shield, similar to the
shield provided by a corporation, against claims arising out of property
owned by the limited liability company.
Limited partnerships provide substantial benefits for owning and managing
real estate, especially for larger projects. Provided it is properly
established, it can provide a shield from claims arising from property held
in the partnership, it is taxed as a partnership from a federal income tax
perspective and does not risk double taxation. The primary negative of the
limited partnership is that it is more expensive to create and maintain than
a limited liability company. For small real estate projects, the expense can
be prohibitive.
Effective January 1, 2007,
corporations, limited liability companies, limited partnerships, business
trusts, and business associations are subject to the Texas franchise tax.
Sole proprietors and general partnerships of natural persons are not subject
to the tax. All businesses with $300,000 or less in total revenue are also
exempt from the tax.
The tax is based upon a taxpayer’s “taxable margin”. Taxable margin is
defined as the lesser of (a) 70% of total revenue or (b) total revenue
reduced by the cost of goods sold or the taxpayer’s employee compensation
expense, capped at $300,000 per employee or owner. The tax rate is 1% of
taxable margin with retailers and wholesalers taxed at only ½% of taxable
margin.
Please view this article as a very basic primer. Due to space limitations, I
have generalized some concepts. You are strongly advised to seek competent
legal and tax advice before undertaking any but the most basic asset
protection techniques.